![]() ![]() As far as we can tell, there's little actual improvement in terms of detail by opting for the latter option - it simply offers up a higher resolution. The Sony platform benefits from two modes: normal and detail. However, revisiting the game in its final release form only sees iterative improvements to performance and by and large, it feels similar in many ways to its work-in-progress showing.Įffectively, there are three console versions available to play right now - PlayStation 4 Pro, base PS4 and Xbox One (with X to follow). ![]() ![]() The fact that the game was a work-in-progress was clearly signposted to users, so the very low resolution and choppy frame-rate was perhaps forgivable. Unreal Engine 4 has proved tricky for some developers to work with, and the scale and scope of Ark: Survival Evolved is clearly daunting. While the game remained in Early Access, Studio Wildcard deserved the benefit of the doubt. But the fact remains that Ark has always performed in a sub-optimal fashion and even now, the title still runs poorly. After all, every version of the game has racked up sales in the millions. Thankfully, quality in this area is much improved across the board, but in the case of Ark: Survival Evolved, performance remains a major weakness for the game - even now, after finally emerging from Early Access.īefore we go on though, we would like to stress that in terms of its concept and in much of its gameplay implementation, Ark: Survival Evolved really is great fun - an aspect of the experience we've discussed in the past, and clearly, the title has caught the imagination of the userbase. With so many games seemingly rushed to market, how well a particular title would run was a crucial factor in any purchasing decision. There was a time when Digital Foundry would produce bespoke performance videos - and indeed Eurogamer articles - for virtually every major release. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |